On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:27 PM, John Mark Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm not sure you're correct about what is being "disappeared", Fae. I >> believe that the Guardian is referring to an article of theirs that is now >> not seen in Google search results for certain terms. The article makes it >> pretty clear that The Guardian does not known which article is involved. > > As it says anonymous applicant, it does seem likely they dont know > which article, or maybe the status of the applicant is officially > 'anonymous' but the details are known and unable to be reported. > > Anyway, I've asked in the off-chance they can give clues. > > https://twitter.com/jayvdb/status/495802112429682688
We have a reply: https://twitter.com/JulietteGarside/status/496644233580003328 "@jayvdb @guardian @Wikipedia @wikisignpost We won't know unless Wikipedia chooses to make that information public" -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
