On July 7th, Katherine Maher of the WMF said that they had not received any notifications and had not made a decision as to how or whether to publicize them. She did say that she thought it would be on next year's transparency report (the first instance of which either came out recently or is coming out shortly). My guess is the report will only describe these notifications in aggregate.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 05/08/2014, John Mark Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > We have a reply: > > https://twitter.com/JulietteGarside/status/496644233580003328 > > > > "@jayvdb @guardian @Wikipedia @wikisignpost We won't know unless > > Wikipedia chooses to make that information public" > > Unless I'm missing something, this means that WMF senior management > can tell us exactly which Wikipedia articles are "suppressed" after > RTV requests to Google. > > What do we (the unpaid volunteer community) want to do with this > information? Ethically this is difficult territory, but openness is > one of our core values, so this should not all be stitched up in > back-rooms without explaining what is going on to the whole community > and aiming for a consensus on action. > > Fae > -- > fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/guidelineswikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
