On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, at 23:35, David Gerard wrote: > On 14 August 2014 13:56, David Cuenca <dacu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It would be more sensible to let contributors participate in the tech > > roadmap in more formal and empowered way than now, because without that > > early participation there is no possibility for later consensus. > > > A pattern we see over and over is that the developers talk at length > about what they're working on in several venues, then it's released > and people claiming to speak for the community claim they were not > adequately consulted. Pretty much no matter what steps were taken to > do so, and what new steps are taken to do so. Because there's always > someone who claims their own lack of interest is someone else's fault. > > > - d.
How could presence of interest help people to fix media viewer? From its early beta testing, I wrote numerous feedback about how going fullscreen is a misleading redundant step. It was not implemented. What more interest could I have? It's not like I care about this too much, but I'm curious as to what you expect me to be able to do to display my "interest". svetlana _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
