Am 10.09.2014 09:56 schrieb "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hoi,
> I expected that it was obvious... Arguments that are based on desktop
> experiences are futile because  the desktop experience is the lesser of
two
> evils. The desktop experience is already bad, the experience on mobiles
and
> tablets is much worse it is intolerably unusable,
>
> Yes, you are overlooking stuff when you only consider inserting an
isolated
> comment that may help. That is not the only problem and not even the main
> problem. Reading and analysing talk pages is already next to impossible in
> this environment therefore inserting an isolated comment does not help
> enough to make the experience at least bearable.
> Thanks,
>       GerardM

What do you propose to make talk pages easier to read and analyse?

>
> On 10 September 2014 09:47, Martijn Hoekstra <martijnhoeks...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 10, 2014 9:35 AM, "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hoi.
> > > When you look at talk pages in isolation, you look at them on a
computer
> > > screen. A mobile or tablet screen is increasingly not used in
isolation.
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean by this.
> >
> > It
> > > is where we find our new users and editors. We cannot afford to ignore
> > > them; they are our future. This is why tinkering with talk pages is
not
> > an
> > > option. Moving away from talk pages because of mobiles and tablets is
the
> > > killer reason why we need to move away from talk pages.
> > >
> > > It is a killer reason because it makes all arguments to the contrary
pale
> > > away.
> > > Thanks,
> > >      GerardM
> >
> > What I find most painful about talk pages on mobile (on the desktop
skin,
> > because so far I've been too impatient to find talk pages and edit
> > functionality on mobile) have been that editing huge text areas really
> > sucks (the scrolling and positioning the cursor is a huge pain). This is
> > not limited to talk pages by the way, but is identical for mainspace
pages.
> >
> > A reply button that inserts an isolated comment at the correct
indentation
> > level would fix that. Am I overlooking stuff?
> > >
> > > On 10 September 2014 09:20, Martijn Hoekstra <
martijnhoeks...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sep 10, 2014 5:11 AM, "Keegan Peterzell" <keegan.w...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Wil Sinclair <w...@wllm.com>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FWIW, I signed my first comment by hand. I missed the comments
> > about
> > > > > > sigs in the wikitext editor interface. If it weren't for my
family
> > > > > > situation, I'm pretty sure I would have bailed. In any case, it
was
> > > > > > much easier to engage at WO, and that was partly- but not
mostly-
> > due
> > > > > > to the fact that they run discussion software over there.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ,Wil
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > ​This - signing by hand - is pretty much a universal experience
for
> > new
> > > > > users, myself included.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Alaska&diff=prev&oldid=26555079
> > > > > ​
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > ~Keegan
> > > > >
> > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan
> > > >
> > > > I'm not saying that isn't crap and unwelcoming: it is, and it deters
> > new
> > > > users. But it's hardly the end of the world either. By signing the
> > wrong
> > > > way no real harm is done, if someone just tells you about the
option to
> > use
> > > > ~~~~
> > > >
> > > > It's crap and archaic and should be fixed, but it's also an example
of
> > the
> > > > idea that there are no mistakes on a wiki. So you did something not
> > right?
> > > > Great, that means you contributed. So we fix it (collaboratively)
and
> > > > improve your contribution, no harm done.
> > > >
> > > > That said, auto sign and a reply button would be a *whole* lot
> > friendlier
> > > > than what we have now, and would be great improvements over the
current
> > > > situation.
> > > >
> > > > Flow definitely has a reply button, and automatic signing as well,
but
> > I
> > > > can't help but think that just those features in isolation would be
> > better
> > > > then completely overhauling talk pages.
> > > >
> > > > --Martijn
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This is my personal email address. Everything sent from this email
> > > > address
> > > > > is in a personal capacity.
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > > > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to