I'm sure I'm not the only one waiting with interest to see Fae's comprehensive proposal for reforming the process. Once that proposal has been offered, anyone interested can comment on whether it is an improvement to the current process. If the consensus is that it is, great! If not, then we can move on. If no proposal for change is offered, then there isn't much to discuss. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury... Richard Symonds
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury... Fæ
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury... Béria Lima
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury... Fæ
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury... Lodewijk
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury... Fæ
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury... Risker
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury... Fæ
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury... Yaroslav M. Blanter
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury... Federico Leva (Nemo)
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury... Nathan
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury... Michael Peel
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimania-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury... Nathan