Hi Sam, That all sounds good. A couple of quick points:
1. What is meant by "excellent goals and plans" is open to interpretation and dependent on context. For example, an "excellent" annual plan for a new user group will look much different than an "excellent" annual plan for WMFR or WMF, and I'm not sure that there is a canonical set of criteria for what constitues an "excellent" plan. 2. Can we have the review of the WMF plan in July that you proposed, plus a separate community discussion that attempts to help everyone including WMF to come up with a list of suggested attributes for "excellent" annual plans and a list of suggested ways of streamlining planning processes while increasing the quality of plans? This might be a good follow up discussion from WMCON. WMF would be a peer and partner of this process, and I think it would be great if the FDC could lead this discussion. Thanks, Pine _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
