The whole point of that page is that they are _interviewed_ and the stories
are published if they _want_ it. If they are uncomfortable with the
attention, no story is published.

I thank all the people who say that they like the idea :)

My original intention was to try to find similar pages and so I could add
relevant interlanguage links, but if there's nothing similar at the moment,
I can wait patiently.

If anybody wants to start such a page in their project, I'll be happy to
make the connection with the people who run it in the Hebrew Wikipedia to
share the experiences.


--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬

2016-01-21 10:17 GMT+02:00 Todd Allen <toddmal...@gmail.com>:

> I'm sure there are plenty of people who would feel uncomfortable with that.
> So if something like that were to be done, people should certainly be asked
> first, and that only be done if they explicitly agree.
>
> Still, I think a lot of others would feel like their efforts are being
> noticed and appreciated. So long as it's opt-in only, I think it's a great
> idea.
>
> Several people have, from time to time, done "editor of the day" type
> things, but those usually only recognized people who'd already been around
> a while. One that specifically focuses on promising newer editors might
> work quite well and make people feel more welcome.
> On Jan 20, 2016 4:12 PM, "Risker" <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 20 January 2016 at 17:51, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 20 January 2016 at 20:56, Asaf Bartov <abar...@wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It is an excellent and popular way to *celebrate* (not just describe)
> > > > good-faith new contributors.  The way it works is a couple of
> > volunteers
> > > > who run the page look for a relatively new contributor who seems to
> > have
> > > > successfully integrated on-wiki, and has made more than a handful of
> > good
> > > > contributions, and they approach the new contributor with a request
> for
> > > an
> > > > interview and a description of this page.
> > >
> > > Sounds great. If en.WP do this as part of The Signpost, it would have
> > > a high level of reach, immediately. Same with Wikidata's weekly
> > > update.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Heh. I think back to when I first started editing.  I would have been
> > completely freaked out at that level of "notice" and would never have
> > edited again.
> >
> > Risker/Anne
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to