On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak <dar...@alk.edu.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks. I think one idea would be to e.g. invite a community representative > to each meeting as an observer, responsible for reviewing the minutes. This > would always be a different person, and by design it could be e.g. always a > former board/FDC member, or chapter representative, or former arbiter from > wikis that have arbiters, or a steward - anyhow, someone who is legitimized > without the need to organize yet another elections. > > To reduce costs, this person could be connecting via Hangout, but physical > presence would also be an option. We could ask this person their views, but > they would mostly be an observer. > I’d be eager to try this idea of observers/scribes from the community, with the slight amendment that I don’t think it *needs* to be a different person every time, though it should certainly be open to participation as much as possible. I’d also like for it to be open to folks from “the media” of our community, such as The Signpost. -Andrew _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
