+1. I would also very much appreciate Patricio explaining whether the "full confidence of the board" actually meant the full confidence: IOW, that a vote was taken and everyone unanimously agreed that Lila's continuation was the best thing.
I note that Patricio, despite being Chairman of the board, and a trustee selected from within the movement, has not participated in this list's discussion of the crisis, or the list at all, since January. This is very disappointing. On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:36 AM, SarahSV <sarahsv.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 10:11 PM, jytdog <jyt...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> How do we work out what actually happened, and how do we resolve the >> contradictions? >> > > Several people have asked Jimmy to release his 30 December 2015 email to > James, in which he apparently explains in part why James was removed. > > Jimmy said on 28 February that he would know within a few days' whether it > was okay to publish it. [1] James has said that nothing needs to be kept > secret for his sake. [2] > > It would be good to have an update regarding that email. > > Sarah > > [1] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-February/082685.html > [2] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-February/082815.html > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
