To be honest, I consider it unlikely that Patricio or anyone else is going to discuss HR matters at length in public, even when they concern Lila, and especially when they could potentially be interpreted as negative towards a particular identifiable individual. For legal reasons, it might be the case that the BoT will let Lila have as dignified an exit as possible from the organisation, without putting a whole bunch of information into the public domain about how they regarded her performance.
Cheers, Craig On 7 March 2016 at 16:39, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1. I would also very much appreciate Patricio explaining whether the > "full confidence of the board" actually meant the full confidence: > IOW, that a vote was taken and everyone unanimously agreed that Lila's > continuation was the best thing. > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
