On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 5:44 PM Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Luis Villa <l...@lu.is> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 1:08 PM Antoine Musso <hashar+...@free.fr> > wrote: > > > >> > >> To the best of my knowledge such agreements are not public, but honestly > >> there is no conspiracy behind that. There are public clues though: > >> > >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Access_to_nonpublic_information_policy > >> https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikitech:Labs_Terms_of_use > >> Others at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal#Policies > >> > > > > In mid-2013, the legal team put the standard employee NDA clauses, and a > > couple others, on-wiki at: > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Non-disclosure_agreements#Wikimedia_Foundation.27s_non-disclosure_agreements > > > > Luis > > Thanks Luis! > > It looks like the non-disparagement clause has now been removed, which > is nice. > There was not one when I joined three years ago. There is still one in the severance agreement I was offered, which is why I didn't sign it - under the circumstances, I didn't feel like I could continue to participate in community processes (strategy, budget, etc.) while signing that clause. Luis _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
