Hi All, response in lines: Dnia 4 sierpnia 2017 12:08 Gilles Chagnon
<cont...@gchagnon.fr> napisał(a): I think the two audits the board
refers to as those by IDEAS. However, except of the announcement of the final
label, there was no report to the community. An audit usually comes with
recommendations and a series of good points/concerns but as far as I know, no
result was shared outside of the board/the direction. I can understand that
some points may be confidential, but I also think that some conclusions could
have been shared, provided the auditing organism had been told to write their
conclusion in a suitable way. G. Chagnon I'd like to confirm: a proper
audit includes conclusions, recommendations, deadlines etc.; making them public
is worth debate but, coming from a very open chapter - I am personally in
favour of openness where possible. Le 04/08/2017 à 11:45, Ilario Valdelli a
écrit : Only an audit can answer. To switch from rumors to facts, this is the
most appropriate solution. It seems that Wikimedia France had two audits (but
it would be interesting to know if limited only to the financial aspects) and
another by the FDC. I would not call the FDC "an audit". It is an
external community review of a grant application as, under present
circumstances, the FDC does not have the capacity, and is not being asked, to
make proper audits (which IMHO should include much more work: both deeper and
wider, and IMO a site visit would be a must). At the moment the FDC members do
not even participate in the regular site visits (mostly due to the budget
constraints). OTOH, the FDC may be indeed one of the closest things to the
actual audit that we have in the Movement. If the community wishes a
stronger audit in general, or a community-supported audit, perhaps it is a good
opportunity to start such a discussion. Best Regards, michał "aegis
maelstrom" buczyński Vice-chair of Wikimedia Poland, FDC Member
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>