Citation and reuse is two different things.

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> that notice states that text has been used, a specific citation where the
> text would add context by using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> Template:Refn
>
> On 27 August 2017 at 22:22, John Erling Blad <jeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Use of a template does not accurately identify the copied text, and in
> this
> > case nor the author.
> >
> > The license is the contract with the author and the reason why the text
> can
> > be copied. If the license says the author shall be identified, the by
> > attribution clause, then a link to the site is not good enough. If the
> > share alike clause is given, then it is even harder to give correct
> credit,
> > as the request for credit can be pretty weird.
> >
> > Anyhow, a page that is later edited is not necessarily something the
> > external editor has created, he or she has created a part that at some
> > point in time was incorporated in the page, and the present page may not
> > even contain this content anymore.
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > There is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:CC-notice on en at
> least
> > > specifically for the purpose of incorporating text licensed cc-by
> content
> > > within articles
> > >
> > > On 27 August 2017 at 21:28, John Erling Blad <jeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In some cases we need to attribute content created on external sites,
> > and
> > > > reused on Wikimedia-sites. In Norway Åndsverksloven says "The creator
> > has
> > > > the right to be named according to good practice" ("Opphavsmannen har
> > > krav
> > > > på å bli navngitt slik som god skikk tilsier") and for our content
> that
> > > is
> > > > given by our license and our terms of use. That means by a link to
> the
> > > page
> > > > if possible, or if possible an entry in the history.
> > > >
> > > > Now we use a template on the page itself, or similar, but it is not
> the
> > > > page on our site that the external entity has provided, they have
> > > provided
> > > > the content at their site. So we must say that in some consistent
> way.
> > > >
> > > > I believe that the best option would be to have a log entry injected
> > into
> > > > the history for our page that says "this revision comes in full or
> part
> > > > from that external source". Such an entry could be made by the editor
> > or
> > > by
> > > > an administrator, but must be made as an extension of the revision.
> It
> > > > should also be possible to delete such an entry.
> > > >
> > > > An alternative could be to make the summary editable, but the summary
> > is
> > > > the description of the revision, not the source of the revision.
> > > >
> > > > Does this make sense? Will it solve the problem, or is it just
> another
> > > > level that makes things more confusing?
> > > >
> > > > John Erling Blad
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > > > wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/
> mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > GN.
> > > President Wikimedia Australia
> > > WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > > wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> GN.
> President Wikimedia Australia
> WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to