Buen día

Puede ser que mi inglés no sea claro y por ello no habré entendido. 
Pero, no veo el punto de solicitar el nombre real para identificar a
quien edita en Wikipedia.

Creo que la privacidad y el respeto al anonimato es parte fundamental
del proyecto. A mi se me ocurren muchos mas temas en contra que en pro,
seguramente porque soy ''conspiranoico''; en muchos países se puede
poner en riesgo la integridad física de las personas a tener un nombre
real con sus ediciones.

Pero nuevamente repito, igual y soy yo que no he entendido correctamente
el punto.

Gracias.


El 17/09/17 a las 17:46, John Erling Blad escribió:
> In some cases it would be a lot easier and/or better if it was possible to
> identify and not just authenticate an user. This could include such things
> as turning on real name for identified users, or limiting elevated rights
> to them, thereby avoiding renomination of banned users.
>
> In a lot of countries it is now possible to get access to systems with
> highly trustworthy identification. This is at least possible in several
> European countries, and I bet it will be quite common in the coming years.
>
> If some users are identified and some not, what would be the pros and cons?
> I guess the difference should be visible somehow, but would it be necessary
> to show who is identified everywhere? It could perhaps be interesting to
> show the persons real names, but that would not be necessary? I can't see
> that identification at the system should imply public disclosure of the
> same information.
>
> Some pros;
> - reclaiming user accounts would be somewhat easier
> - real names could be used (no impersonation)
> - user verification of various public departments
> - proofs of identity for copyright claims
>
> Some cons;
> - non-identified users might feel they are second rate citizens
> - easier to stalk users with real names ((trans)gender problem?)

-- 
*petrohs, el compa obrero*
/"Cada cual según sus fuerzas, cada quien según sus necesidades..."/
[gpg <https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Privacy_Guard>: 15AD 0077 7028
D720 539C D2B0 CEB5 C220 F1B7 1CDB
<https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xCEB5C220F1B71CDB>]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to