https://disconnect.me works well for this with both AdBlock (which can
do the same thing by itself with its advanced options) and AdBlock
Plus (which can't, and is a completely different product.)



On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Liam Wyatt <liamwy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How insidious!
> “we encourage you to consider tools which block unwanted third-party
> scripts like the one provided by Facebook.”
> - where can I go to learn more about that specifically?
>
> Thank you Greg, for having the unenviable task of being the bearer of bad
> news, and to all those involved in this; you had with the talent to
> identify and remove this code, and the principles to tell us about it.
>
>
>
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 at 04:22, Michael Peel <em...@mikepeel.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gregory,
>>
>> Thank you and the WMF for sharing this information so quickly after the
>> event. It’s regrettable that this happened, but openness is the best way
>> forward here. The WMF is being exceptional both with spotting this kind of
>> issue so quickly and being publicly open about the fact that it happened.
>>
>> Is there a phabricator ticket that is tracking this issue and/or a wiki
>> page that documents the issue and the steps that will be taken to avoid it
>> happening again in the future?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>> > On 16 Mar 2018, at 22:57, Gregory Varnum <gvar...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 14 March and 15 March 2018, a CentralNotice banner appeared to some
>> logged-out users viewing English Wikipedia pages. The banner contained
>> JavaScript hosted by Facebook, which allowed Facebook to collect traffic
>> data from those who visited a page with a banner. The banner was prepared
>> by the Wikimedia Foundation. The Foundation turned the banner off as soon
>> as we learned how the script was running, and its potential scope. We have
>> also removed all references to the code in question from CentralNotice on
>> Meta-Wiki.
>> >
>> > The code utilized in this banner was based on an unused prototype
>> created by an outside vendor. Because the prototype was never enabled, the
>> vendor’s prototype code was not subjected to our standard quality assurance
>> process. However, we made the mistake of reusing the code for a different
>> purpose, and implementing it based on recommendations in documentation from
>> Twitter and Facebook to improve the appearance of shared links. At the
>> time, our understanding was that the platforms would only receive traffic
>> data if the user clicked on the link. Although this was true for Twitter,
>> the Facebook code operated differently.
>> >
>> > We discovered the problematic link configurations during our ongoing
>> monitoring of live banners. The recommended code enhanced not only the
>> appearance of links, it also enhanced Facebook's ability to collect
>> information on people visiting non-Facebook sites. As soon as we realized
>> these banners were sharing information without even having to click the
>> link, we disabled them and began an investigation. Staff in multiple
>> departments are collaboratively reviewing the incident as well as
>> procedural and technical improvements to prevent future incidents.
>> >
>> > While this sort of tracking is commonplace today across most of the
>> internet, it is not consistent with our policies. We are disappointed that
>> this type of hidden data collection is routinely recommended by major
>> platforms, without clearer disclosure.
>> >
>> > These practices are why we all must regularly take routine steps to
>> maintain a secure computer and account. As the Wikimedia Foundation
>> continues to explore ways we can do that within Wikimedia's platform, we
>> encourage you to consider tools which block unwanted third-party scripts
>> like the one provided by Facebook.
>> >
>> > We apologize for sending this late on a Friday (San Francisco time).
>> However, we wanted to provide this information as quickly as possible.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to