One reason; reach. At nowiki we vere approached some years ago by a university about publishing cutting edge research in fish farming. We could not publish their work because some claimed it to be "original research". Sure it was, and it was darn good original research too. I don't think that was a single occurence, other communities has probably had similar questions.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 2:29 PM Vi to <vituzzu.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In years I've seen countless attempts to put gibberish on our projects > which were eventually defeated by the "no original research" principle. > Even en.wikiversity struggled with a now banned user (and his > friends/enablers) pushing lots of gibberish about cold fusion, paranormal > and Wikimedia user themselves. So I ask, what will prevent this kind of > gibberish from slowing infiltrating such project? > > Don't get me wrong but I think this is the first question in order to > define a "business model" for the project: why would a "serious" research > group choose to publish there instead of already existing OA journals or > classical PR journals? > > Vito > > Il giorno lun 3 giu 2019 alle ore 04:16 Thomas Shafee < > thomas.sha...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > Yes, we put together a little checklist back in round one (*link* > > < > > https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal_User_Group#Notes_on_Plan_S_compliance_criteria > > > > > ). > > > > Initially there were a few items that are currently not achieved (e.g. > > JATS-compliant XML formatting). The revised Plan_S has reduced stringency > > and all the items that weren't hit happen to be optional. That being said, > > things like JATS-compliant XML and citation metadata would be valuable to > > implement anyway for machine readability. > > > > Thomas > > > > On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 04:53, James Heilman <jmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > It already is Plan-S compliant :-) > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_S#Licensing_and_rights > > > > > > Plan-S unfortunately is looking at allowing ND content. > > > > > > James > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 8:14 AM Mister Thrapostibongles < > > > thrapostibong...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > Is it intended that the journals should be Plan-S compliant? > > > > > > > > Thrapostibongles > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 9:01 AM Thomas Shafee <thomas.sha...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello Wikipedians, > > > > > > > > > > Over the last few years, the WikiJournal User Group > > > > > <https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group> has been > > > > building > > > > > and testing a set of peer reviewed academic journals on a mediawiki > > > > > platform. The main types of articles are: > > > > > > > > > > - Existing Wikipedia articles submitted for external review and > > > > feedback > > > > > (example <https://doi.org/10.15347/wjs/2018.006>) > > > > > - From-scratch articles that, after review, are imported to > > > Wikipedia > > > > ( > > > > > example <https://doi.org/10.15347/wjm/2018.001>) > > > > > - Original research articles that are not imported to Wikipedia > > > > (example > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine/Acute_gastrointestinal_bleeding_from_a_chronic_cause:_a_teaching_case_report > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > *Proposal: WikiJournals as a new sister project > > > > > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiJournal>* > > > > > > > > > > From a Wikipedian point of view, this is a complementary system to > > > > Featured > > > > > article review, but bridging the gap with external experts > > > > > < > > https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Peer_reviewers > > > >, > > > > > implementing established scholarly practices > > > > > < > > > https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Ethics_statement > > > > >, > > > > > and generating citable, doi-linked publications > > > > > <https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Publishing>. > > > > > > > > > > Please take a look and support/oppose/comment! > > > > > All the best, > > > > > Thomas Shafee > > > > > > > > > > ps, We are attempting to improve awareness within the existing > > > wikimedia > > > > > community, so feel free to share with others. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > > Unsubscribe: > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > James Heilman > > > MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
