Camelia,

My comment was not about harassment, was about systemic and rampant lack of
due process on the part of the WMF.
And it's not drama, it's reality.

Paulo

camelia boban <camelia.bo...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia sexta, 21/06/2019
à(s) 15:24:

> Oh my Gosh Paulo, can you stop this dramma about yourself and your problem
> with everything is connected with WMF?
>
> To others, please have respect for the both parts engaged in this sad
> story and do what Geert asked, stop discussing about this specific
> conflict publicly.
> If you want to talk more about harassment (in a generic way), then open
> another thread.
>
> Thank you,
> Camelia
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Il giorno ven 21 giu 2019 alle ore 16:05 Paulo Santos Perneta <
> paulospern...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>> False accusation with the respective punishment, that is. If it was just a
>> false accusation I would not care that much about it, though I obviously
>> dislike being falsely accused.
>>
>> Paulo
>>
>> A sexta, 21 de jun de 2019, 15:01, Paulo Santos Perneta <
>> paulospern...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>> > Hi Robert,
>> >
>> > I believe you will only keep that opinion until the day you would be
>> > subject to a false accusation by the WMF, without even knowing it, and
>> > having no way to defend yourself appeal.
>> >
>> > Everything is easy to talk about and have opinions while it is only
>> > happening to the others. Unfortunately it is not my case, and I know in
>> > first person how flawed the system is.
>> >
>> > Apart from the details of the case described by the OP, the almost total
>> > lack of due process is extremely worrying, especially to those who
>> already
>> > experimented it failing in first hand.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Paulo
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > A sexta, 21 de jun de 2019, 14:43, Robert Fernandez <
>> > wikigamal...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>> >
>> >> At some point we have to decide who this movement and community is
>> >> for.  Is it for popular individuals to act out in any way they please
>> >> and be awarded maximum freedom and lack of accountability?  Or is it
>> >> so we can insure a friendly space for everyone, including those who
>> >> are not popular, who are not loud voices on community forums, who do
>> >> not want to be harassed or leered at or made uncomfortable?
>> >>
>> >> Everything is a tradeoff, and based on what I've seen I'll take the
>> >> lack of "due process" from trained and responsible professionals over
>> >> the popularity contests of the mob any day.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:56 AM Paulo Santos Perneta
>> >> <paulospern...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Taking everything and their dog as "harassment", without due process
>> to
>> >> > verify it, and issuing punishments one can't appeal based on that,
>> >> creates
>> >> > a feeling of fear and insecurity in the events; and provides a tool
>> >> easy to
>> >> > abuse by clever persons who understood how to game the system, as a
>> >> vehicle
>> >> > for severe harassment itself.
>> >> >
>> >> > This creates an unsafe and unfriendly space in the events,and should
>> >> really
>> >> > be looked at.
>> >> >
>> >> > Best,
>> >> > Paulo
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > A sexta, 21 de jun de 2019, 06:57, Natacha Rault via Wikimedia-l <
>> >> > wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> escreveu:
>> >> >
>> >> > > First of all I don’t know the context of this conversation. I know
>> >> that I
>> >> > > personnally find that the actions of  Trust& Safety  very valuable
>> and
>> >> > > wise. I totally support and trust their judgement.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I am tired of seing their work criticized, and do not appreciate
>> >> official
>> >> > > chapter representants and employees publicly supporting alleged
>> >> offenders,
>> >> > > showing no aknowledgement of the fact that this is very toxic for
>> >> alleged
>> >> > > victims, and does not help to change attitude towards issues of
>> >> > > harrassment.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > How can we feel safe in the movement if the decisions of T&S are
>> >> > > questionned by official members of our movement?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Nattes à chat
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Le 21 juin 2019 à 01:04, Chris Keating <chriskeatingw...@gmail.com>
>> a
>> >> > > écrit :
>> >> > >
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> It is extremely disappointing, and *extremely typical* of the
>> >> Wikimedia
>> >> > > >> movement, to see an entire thread like this dedicated to
>> supporting
>> >> > > someone
>> >> > > >> who Trust & Safety has found to have acted in such a way that
>> they
>> >> had
>> >> > > to
>> >> > > >> intervene. It is even more disappointing to see a person who was
>> >> > > affected
>> >> > > >> by his actions told "this is not your story" and "it may help
>> you
>> >> when
>> >> > > you
>> >> > > >> grow some sensitivity and respect this experience, the
>> >> > > >> feelings of others."
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> If you're wondering why women leave the Wikimedia movement, and
>> why
>> >> > > >> Wikimedia has such a bad harassment problem in general, just
>> >> reflect on
>> >> > > >> this thread.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Thank you, Molly, for expressing what I was just trying to summon
>> >> the
>> >> > > > energy to write.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Chris
>> >> > > > _______________________________________________
>> >> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> >> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> >> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> >> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> > > > Unsubscribe:
>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> >> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
>> ?subject=unsubscribe>
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > _______________________________________________
>> >> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> >> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> >> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> >> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> > > Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>> >> ,
>> >> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
>> ?subject=unsubscribe>
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> >> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> >> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to