On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 11:50, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote: > The WMF board and their CEO know it is in their interest to take on any > firm community consensus rather than playing > political games to get around it. >
Political games, like requesting supermajority <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_comment/Partial_blocks#Supermajority_needed> would be best avoided, indeed. > As others have expressed, I am not in the least bit inclined to give any > feedback on meta. It's a waste of volunteer time, as effective as shouting > out of your office window expecting to make the weather change. > > Fae > On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 11:38, Gergő Tisza <gti...@gmail.com> wrote: > having participated in writing some of these recommendations, I can tell > you from personal experience they have been massively shaped by feedback. > That included feedback on the talk pages, feedback at events and > conferences, feedback from strategy salons organized for that specific > purpose, feedback from all kinds of personal conversations... often > conflicting feedback, since, unsurprisingly, different people within the > movement often have opposing views. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
