Hi again, Another potentially interesting podcast for some touching this matter (more or less): https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/podcasts/hard-fork-bing-ai-elon.html
Linked to the ones I sent before on the other thread. If this is the new Napster revolution equivalent, yeah I know... back in the day, buckle up! Cheers, On Mon, Feb 20, 2023, 17:33 Jimmy Wales <jimmywa...@wikitribune.com> wrote: > Speaking only for myself, out of curiosity, some real world examples might > be helpful here. I don't have access to Bing's > version yet, but I do have access to chat.openai.com which is very > impressive but deeply flawed. > > I asked "Who is Kate Garvey?" (my wife, known a bit to the media, but not > famous) and the answer is weird and laughably bad with > more sentences false than true. Among other silly things, it says that > she worked for Theresa May and was involved > with Brexit negotiations, which if you knew my wife's politics borders on > libel. It also says she co-founded an organization > (which as far as I can tell, it just made up out of thin air) with Nick > Clegg's wife. It's completely mad. > > > > > On 2023-02-20 09:34, Anders Wennersten wrote: > > > BIng with ChatGPT is now released by Micrsoft. > > And from what I > understand they use Wikipedia content considerably. > If you ask Who is A B > and A B is not widely known, the result is more > or less identical to the > content from the Wikipedia article (but > worse, as it "makes up" facts > that is incorrect). > > In a way I am glad to see Wikipedia is fully > relevant even in this > emerging AI-driven search world. But Google search > has ben careful to > always have a link to Wikipedia besides their made up > summary of > facts, which here it is missing (yet?). And for licences, they > are > all ignored. > > So if this is the future the number of accesses from > users to > Wikipedia will collapse, and also their willingness to donate... > (but > our content still a cornerstone for knowledge) > > Anders > > (I got > a lot of fact from an article in Swedish main newspaper by > their tech > editor. He started asking fact of himself, and when he > received facts > from his Wp article plus being credited to a book he > had noting to do > with, he started to try to tell/learn ChatGPT of > this error. The chatPGT > only got angry accusing the techeditor for > lying and in the end cut off > the conversation, as ChatGPT continued > to teat the techeditor as lyer and > vandal..). > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l > mailing > list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/GJJNX2Y7BX5RZYGAIYTUI6O6CSBN72EH/ > > > To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines > at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > Public archives at > https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/MRF2C3YMIF64RNWOYD3PB2DZ24VVFKMG/ > To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/ZT3JW7YF6PCBHP6SOOD3RGITFSSMSMDO/ To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org