Congratulations indeed!

@Phoebe Ayers <[email protected]> from a quick glance at :
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_of_Trustees
diversity still remains an issue, but appointed seats have carried the most
diverse profile it seems. Which to be honest make sense as elections are
usually a reflection of the composition of the movement.

That being said, and it's a much larger discussion, I also believe we're
trying to achieve too many things with that one board. At the same time you
need a set of "business" skill set as you're running a very very large and
global organisation, we want community representativeness and Diversity in
a broad sense. All of that in 12 seats. I would love us to set what is the
most important and work from there. We never could and never will be able
to strike a balance between those three things :)


--
Christophe


On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 13:30, phoebe ayers <[email protected]> wrote:

> Congratulations to all the candidates, and thank you to everyone who ran
> and put a lot of time into the process. And thanks especially to our
> ongoing and outgoing trustees. The board is a ton of work, and one of the
> hardest jobs in our movement.
>
> Re: processes, part of the idea, back in the day, for having two processes
> for the affiliate votes and the general vote was that it could help ensure
> geographical diversity (though I'm not sure that was true in practice).
> These two processes were combined a couple of years ago. I'm not sure going
> back to the old system is the right answer, but I do think it takes a
> variety of strategies to get candidates who both understand Wikimedia and
> the motivations of editors AND are interested in overseeing the governance
> of a multi-million dollar organization -- which is the job we are asking
> these folks to do.
>
> Best,
> Phoebe (trustee 2010-2015)
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024, 05:49 Philip Kopetzky <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Well, congratulations to 4 people living in Western Europe. If this
>> result doesn't get the Wikimedia Foundation to rethink their approach to
>> how they select their board members, I don't know what will.
>>
>> I guess it's up to communities, affiliates and regional structures to
>> create the change we want to see, noe more than ever.
>>
>> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024, 11:38 Katie Chan, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> *You can find translations of this message or help translate this
>>> message on Meta
>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2024/Announcement/Results(short_version)>.*
>>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Thank you to everyone who participated in the 2024 Wikimedia Foundation
>>> Board of Trustees election
>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2024>.
>>> 6000 community members from more than 180 wiki projects have voted.
>>>
>>> The following four candidates were the most voted:
>>>
>>>    - Christel Steigenberger
>>>    - Maciej Artur Nadzikiewicz
>>>    - Victoria Doronina
>>>    - Lorenzo Losa
>>>
>>> While these candidates have been ranked through the vote, they still
>>> need to be appointed to the Board of Trustees. They need to pass a
>>> successful background check and meet the qualifications outlined in the
>>> Bylaws. New trustees will be appointed at the next Board meeting in
>>> December 2024.
>>>
>>> Read the full announcement on Meta-Wiki
>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2024/Announcement/Results(long_version)>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> The Elections Committee and Board Selection Working Group
>>>
>>> --
>>> Katie Chan
>>> Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the 
>>> author and do not necessarily represent the view of any organisation the 
>>> author is associated with or employed by.
>>>
>>>
>>> Experience is a good school but the fees are high.
>>>     - Heinrich Heine
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines
>>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>> Public archives at
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/4HJ2INEFLQD233H3BQBWZ2BP65NN7FRY/
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines
>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> Public archives at
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/HXWD2ZSMZF46OVVBBZY45OSNJSHX5AYM/
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/I4HEYUBQ2VTOLR332TI2BQD3OJSRXYJC/
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/6B3XTARHYAPULPOGKEFVM54K5AN5CTBP/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to