All help is welcome, these two categories are a must, you can add further categories if they already exist or if there is a justifiable reason to create a new one you can create those and add the cat to these files.
Though, I would suggest we all refrain from adding too many categories. I was asked on Commons not to add more than 1-2 categories. On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Anirudh Bhati <anirudh...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Noopur <noopur.ra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just to add to what Konarak and Ashwin said, I am guilty as charged. We > kept > > the Category:Ahmedabad_1 to avoid flooding the popular category. It was > > decided to serve as the ''maintenance category'' but none of us really > got > > around to transferring images to the Ahmedabad category or cleaning up. > > There are several reasons for this: > > It was clearly not your fault. You are a new user and I should have > migrated these files to the regular categories. I am now removing > [[Category:Ahmedabad 1]] and replacing with it [[Category:Ahmedabad]] > and [[Category:Wikipedia takes Ahmedabad 1]]. All help is welcome, > these two categories are a must, you can add further categories if > they already exist or if there is a justifiable reason to create a new > one you can create those and add the cat to these files. I'm no > expert on Commons categorization, but there are a bunch of helpful > power users available on #wikipedia-en and #wikimedia-commons who can > help you out with that. > > We decided to go with [[Category:Ahmedabad 1]] instead of > [[Category:Wikipedia takes Ahmedabad 1]] because we assumed that would > make it easier for the users to add these categories easily. > > > > > 1) People started using images from Ahmedabad_1 soon after the event to > make > > Ahmedabad articles. So, the attention was diverted there. > > Indeed. A few good images made it to the articles, while a couple of > images inspired creation of articles around important monuments. See > [[Hutheesing Jain Temple]] (and thanks Srikeit for that). > > > > > 2) Personally, I was unclear as to whether all these images had to be > > migrated because of course some are repetitive and redundant. But, I/We > are > > no one to judge whose image stays or goes. > > Yes, indeed. > > Thanks, > anirudh > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimediaindia-l mailing list > > Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimediaindia-l mailing list > Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l > -- Noopur Raval Student Arts and Aesthetics Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Ph: 9650567690
_______________________________________________ Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
