Arrey no. Chill ya. You are our biggest success story of the photothon :P
This comment was generally regarding how too many images can make us all
lazy.

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Konarak Ratnakar <konarak...@live.com>wrote:

>  Hey Noopur,
> If I sounded accusing, I apologize for that. I was going to do this
> categorization work and saw this mail here.
> And Anirudh, I'm on it, I'll add/create proper categories to the images.
>
> > From: anirudh...@gmail.com
> > Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:19:38 +0530
> > To: wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Lesson from the past: Photowalks and
> other events
>
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Noopur <noopur.ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Just to add to what Konarak and Ashwin said, I am guilty as charged.
> We kept
> > > the Category:Ahmedabad_1 to avoid flooding the popular category. It was
> > > decided to serve as the ''maintenance category'' but none of us really
> got
> > > around to transferring images to the Ahmedabad category or cleaning up.
> > > There are several reasons for this:
> >
> > It was clearly not your fault. You are a new user and I should have
> > migrated these files to the regular categories. I am now removing
> > [[Category:Ahmedabad 1]] and replacing with it [[Category:Ahmedabad]]
> > and [[Category:Wikipedia takes Ahmedabad 1]]. All help is welcome,
> > these two categories are a must, you can add further categories if
> > they already exist or if there is a justifiable reason to create a new
> > one you can create those and add the cat to these files. I'm no
> > expert on Commons categorization, but there are a bunch of helpful
> > power users available on #wikipedia-en and #wikimedia-commons who can
> > help you out with that.
> >
> > We decided to go with [[Category:Ahmedabad 1]] instead of
> > [[Category:Wikipedia takes Ahmedabad 1]] because we assumed that would
> > make it easier for the users to add these categories easily.
> >
> > >
> > > 1) People started using images from Ahmedabad_1 soon after the event
> to make
> > > Ahmedabad articles. So, the attention was diverted there.
> >
> > Indeed. A few good images made it to the articles, while a couple of
> > images inspired creation of articles around important monuments. See
> > [[Hutheesing Jain Temple]] (and thanks Srikeit for that).
> >
> > >
> > > 2) Personally, I was unclear as to whether all these images had to be
> > > migrated because of course some are repetitive and redundant. But,
> I/We are
> > > no one to judge whose image stays or goes.
> >
> > Yes, indeed.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > anirudh
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
> > > Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
> > Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>
>


-- 
Noopur Raval
Student
Arts and Aesthetics
Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
Ph: 9650567690
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l

Reply via email to