This is, of course, the way that we originally started the newsletters/reports way back in 2008, when we took the Signpost model and adapted it. ;-)
E.g. see: http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Newsletter/July2009 http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK_v2.0/Newsletter/Subscribers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mike_Peel/Archive_6#Wikimedia_UK_Newsletter_-_July_2009_Issue Thanks, Mike On 22 Nov 2012, at 12:36, Thomas Morton <morton.tho...@googlemail.com> wrote: > A model such as the Wikipedia signpost might work... > > Which, for those that don't know, has a fairly regular format of things it > covers (with a nice layout), plus it accepts articles/editorial from the > community. > > I'm sure the current monthly reports could be formatted in a similar way; > find someone to be an "editor" to write the intro each month, and perhaps > coerce jon into writing a short CE's report and you have the makings of a > newsletter. > > Then it's a case of drumming up other articles :) > > Tom > > On 22 November 2012 12:32, John Byrne <j...@bodkinprints.co.uk> wrote: > r own version. We should always bear this in mind, and encourage > contributions from outside the existing r-l community, but probably early > numbers will concentrate UK news on chapter & meetup affairs, as well as > wider issues like the internet bill thingy. But the main thing is to get one > going. Obviously, from the chapter POV, the newsletter should be a prime > means of reaching out to the wider community and recruiting active volunteers. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
