I've been thinking about that thread, and well it doesn't really have a lot of practical advice at first glance, here's some thoughts I came up with (these thoughts may be rough arround the edges/unsuitable, this is just off the top of my head)
*Synthesis vs OR - should we be doing more to highlight our original reporting. Currently we highlight OR by a list on the sidebar of the main page, and a little box on the article. Should we do more? In the early days of wikinews, We at one point wrote '''Original Reporting''' in italics beside any OR article name in the big list of articles on the Main Page. perhaps we should revisit that idea. (cf example: [[Wikinews:2005/June/18]]) *Someone on the foundation-l thread was comparing a news website to a newspaper, and talked about one of the main benifits of a news paper is you can see lots of different articles all at once. Perhaps one radical main page design would be instead of a list of articles + a couple leads, the entire main page is leads that change on each page load to different articles or something. thoughts? -bawolff On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Brian McNeil <[email protected]> wrote: > What can Wikinews take from this and work on? > > > > A repeated concern is that we’re always ‘behind the times’ when we do > synthesis reports. There’s a degree of truth to that, but taking material > from multiple mainstream reports should make our coverage more > comprehensive, if albeit a little later. > > > > Second, is how can we work with others? Blogs, Indymedia, and so on all > generally have a bias and/or axe to grind. This runs counter to NPOV. > > > > Third, original reporting. Considering the size of the contributor base I > think we do pretty well on this. Are there ways we can attract more people > to do investigative work? Should we be organising things to have an online > ‘Wikinews Rolodex’ for accredited reporters? > > > > Can’t think of anything else from this or the discussion on foundation-l – > was surprised that was so reasonable and not “damn Wikinews! We can do news > in Wikipedia!”. > > > > > > Brian. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: 11 May 2009 23:18 > To: Wikinews mailing list > Subject: Re: [Wikinews-l] News Corp to charge for newspaper websites > > > > Ragesoss, who has written Wikinews OR, has some thoughts about Wikinews on > his blog. > > There is also a live thread about Wikinews on foundation-l. > > --SVTCobra > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Fred Bauder > Date: Saturday, May 9, 2009 5:24 pm > Subject: Re: [Wikinews-l] News Corp to charge for newspaper websites > To: Wikinews mailing list > >> We'll pay what something is worth, to us. Murdock controls the Wall >> Street Journal and The Times, of London. They are both pretty >> good. I >> paid $20 a year for full access to The New York Times. That is >> what I can >> imagine paying for a high quality on-line publication. This is >> not a >> solution for the average paper in trouble, such as The Rocky Mountain >> Journal. They may not be worth much to anyone. >> >> Fred Bauder >> >> > Good luck to them - somehow i can't imagine most people paying >> for it. >> > >> > -bawolff >> > >> > >> > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Jon Davis >> wrote: >> >> Well it would bring new meaning to 'free' in our tag line >> "The free >> >> news >> >> source you can write!" >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 16:53, wrote: >> >>> >> >>> If this idea spreads it could fundamentally change the way >> we create >> >>> most >> >>> of our articles ... >> >>> >> >>> Guardian article: >> >>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/may/07/rupert-murdoch- >> charging-websites >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Wikinews-l mailing list >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jon >> >> [[User:ShakataGaNai]] >> >> http://snowulf.com/ - Blog >> >> http://snowulf.imagekind.com/ - Pictures >> >> This has been a test of the emergency sig system. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Wikinews-l mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l >> >> >> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wikinews-l mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikinews-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikinews-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l > > _______________________________________________ Wikinews-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l
