On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 11:24 +0000, Peter Coombe wrote:
> On 17 March 2010 04:06, Brian McNeil <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > It was at short notice we were seeking competition sponsorship - with
> > the hope this would bring in a lot of competitors. It did not go as well
> > as I would have liked, and several reasonably established contributors
> > somewhat gamed the system by writing just-qualifying articles in
> > preference to the in-depth work I hoped to solicit.
> > ...
> > So, to return to the writing competition, I think it has - to some
> > extent - be written off as a failure...
> 
> Brian, I don't think this is a fair assessment either for the compo
> entrants or for you organising the competition. One of the most common
> complaints about Wikinews seems to be that we simply don't cover
> *enough* stories to be a real news source, worth checking regularly.
> In-depth pieces are great, but we also need the shorter stories - and
> writing them ought to be rewarded too. Besides, some people just find
> it easier and more fun to do. Maybe tweaking the points system a
> little would make for a more interesting race, but there was no way to
> know until we tried it, and now we have a better idea about next time.

You're probably right that I'm being unduly hard, but you know I'm
somewhat of a perfectionist.
> 
> As it is, the compo has produced quite a few new articles, and more
> importantly new contributors. Personally, I know I'm not doing
> brilliantly, but it has encouraged me to add the extra little bit to
> my stories. Plus it stopped me bringing in articles from Voice of
> America, which I'm sure you're pleased about :-)

I'm certainly happy to see quite a few more people such as yourself
start contributing articles. Yes, a lot are going to be fairly short
pieces - that's always somewhat of an issue with new contributors;
master the three-paragraph form, and then move on to more in-depth
pieces.

I do want to see if I can keep lines of communication open with Fabrice
and others at NewsTrust. There's really very little competition entries
I'd say qualify for the in-depth stuff they're really interested it, but
it is a valuable connection to maintain. I just don't know how we can
involve them in some sort of post-mortem of the competition and, perhaps
for future attempts, round up some Knight Foundation funding for real
citizen-journalism oriented prizes. [I'm thinking Lexis-Nexis
subscriptions, digital voice recorders, and low-mid-range camera kit.]


-- 
Brian McNeil <[email protected]>
Wikinewsie.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Wikinews-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l

Reply via email to