Hi Andrew

I'm sorry for replying so late,  thank you very much for your offer, I'm
sure that  I (we) will contact you, when we convert the next old projects.
But at the moment were are pushing hard to reduce the unvalidated pages
especially on projects which stay here for a long time without any progress
- we call them Altlasten (inherited burdens).


ThomasV,

I'm quite happy, that we found an agreement for the IP's and proofread.


greetings joergens.mi


2010/7/9 ThomasV <thoma...@gmx.de>

> ok, I just commited a configuration option that
> will allow anons to modify pagequality levels.
>
> In the future, I plan to automate semi-protection of
> pages when they reach q4 ; this task is currently being
> done by robots at de.ws. Note that this option might
> cause problems when semi-protection is enabled, because
> an anonymous user who sets a page to q4 will be locked
> out from editing again. We can restrict IPs to q3 in users
> in order to avoid that.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
> ThomasV a écrit :
> > I recently had an interesting IRC discussion with two users of
> > the German Wikisource (PDD and Paulis). It turned out that what
> > they request is not a complete disabling of the extension's identity
> > check, as I thought previously. They want IPs to be allowed to modify
> > quality levels, but they also agree with the extension forbidding to
> > the same user to set both q3 and q4, or to set q4 directly.
> >
> > I think that I can accept such a solution, because it would not
> > strongly damage the semantics of q3 and q4. It remains to be
> > seen if this solution can be accepted by the rest of the de.ws
> > community. They both seemed confident about that.
> >
> > Thomas
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikisource-l mailing list
> Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

Reply via email to