Ok; imagine that while opening a level 3 page, an ajax query uploads quietly the raw code of the page; as soon as you click the "Big Green Button" the script could edit the code and send it to the server - in milliseconds - and immediately could click the next page button.
If a review of page in view mode is all what is needed to validate it, there's no reason to enter in edit mode when there's nothing to fix. Alex 2015-08-10 18:14 GMT+02:00 Andrea Zanni <zanni.andre...@gmail.com>: > The Big Validate Button is a good idea, > but I also would like a better navigation experience, as it is pretty slow > and cumbersome to got on the top of the page to click a tiny arrow, wait > for the new page, click edit, etc. > > Aubrey > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Alex Brollo <alex.bro...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> If this is true, then to add a big button "Validate" to edit by ajax the >> code of the page (the header section only needs to be changed if there's no >> error to fix into the txt) should be a banal task for a good programmer. >> >> Perhaps Andrea is asking for much more, but this could be a first step. >> >> Alex >> >> >> >> 2015-08-10 14:47 GMT+01:00 Nicolas VIGNERON <vigneron.nico...@gmail.com>: >> >>> 2015-08-10 15:37 GMT+02:00 Alex Brollo <alex.bro...@gmail.com>: >>> > >>> > First point is: >>> > is it a safe practice to validate a page without reviewing its raw >>> code? >>> >>> Probably yes. >>> Obviously, it's safer to check the raw code but it's unrealistic to >>> expect the raw code to be review for all page. Anyway, the pages doesn't >>> contain a lot of code (and most pages does'nt contain code at all), so it >>> doesn't seems to be crucial to me. >>> Plus : when VisualEditor will be on WS, less and less people will >>> actually see the raw wikicode. >>> >>> > A second point: is it a safe practice to validate a page without >>> carefully reviewing its transclusion into ns0? >>> >>> Definitively yes. >>> When can a transclusion can go wrong? In all cases I can think of, the >>> problem come from templates, css classes or general stuff like that. It >>> should be fixed generally and it shouldn't block the page validation since >>> it have nothing to do the the page itself (but maybe I'm missing an obvious >>> example here). >>> >>> > Alex >>> >>> Cdlt, ~nicolas >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikisource-l mailing list >>> Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikisource-l mailing list >> Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
