2015-08-11 11:28 GMT+01:00 Nicolas VIGNERON <vigneron.nicolas at gmail.com>: > Then it seems that the quality level has not the same meaning on > every wikisources. Typo such as « rn » intead of « m » are usually > removed on the red or yellow step on fr.ws (and such obvious error > can be seen before editing, reviewing the final render code seems enough to > me). on pl ws it should be done on "without text" -> red step
> for me all typo should be gone at the previous stage (and > personally, I don't go from red to yellow if there is still such typo > mistakes). should be... but statistically on red-> yellow step I find 2-4 typos, on yellow-> green step - 1-2 typos (on fr ws too); if on yellow-> green step I could not found any typos, I do not change its status immediately, leave it on another day to be sure. I'll write it again ... that is not safe to validate a page without reviewing its wikicode. A BGB at the end of the PREVIEW(!) content in Page namespace WITHOUT displaying and reviewing wikitext content (raw code) it's a bad proposal, declining the quality of proofreading process results, and... I do not think so that "it's unrealistic to expect the raw code to be review for all page" for that kind of "edition" it should be special level "pseudovalidate" - best in pink. Z. _______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l