I read a lot of misunderstanding here, probably due to the fact that none of us are native speaker.
@Wiera Lee: please, please, please, don't shout. This is a civil discussion. What Alex did is just a button that you double click and you go directly in the Edit mode. Nothing more, and only I have it. It's *definitely not a final decision of any kind*. So the message you sent earlier is simply not true. So we can restart a nice conversation :-D @Lugusto thanks for sharing your experience. I probably said the wrong "color", in this discussion: green. That is not necesseraly what I really want (of course I thought about validation at the beginning of the thread). What I really really want is * a simpler life for our readers * a way to harness/tap/exploit the simple fact that a lot of users DO read our books, but never correct anything. What I really want is a very very quick way, for a user, to correct a typo WHEN she sees it. Maybe we could do a BIG YELLOW BUTTON (meaning 75%), or maybe we can simply find *another* way for a user to signal the simple fact that we correct a typo or similar. My fear is that Wikisource is way to complicated, and a lot of people read our texts, and they could help us but we are too complicated to let them. Can we try to solve this? Aubrey On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Nicolas VIGNERON < vigneron.nico...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2015-08-12 7:00 GMT+02:00 Alex Brollo <alex.bro...@gmail.com>: > >> Please don't presume that such a controversial tool hase been implemented >> anywhere ..... "running" only means that che code can run; presently only >> *one* user (Aubrey) can click it, just to test it. >> >> Alex >> > > I asked on the frws scriptorium, if the community wants to test it on frws > ( > https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Scriptorium/Ao%C3%BBt_2015#Big_green_button > ). I'll ask on brws too (but I'll be away). > > *You* (dear reader on this mail) can ask *your* community if *you* want > this tool or not and how. Nothing has been decided and certainly not in > your place. > > @Luiz : there is some very good ideas in your mail. If the code works for > green, surely it could be adapt easily for yellow. > You have a contention on orthographyon ptws? Can you provide the links? > (I'd like to know more as the only convention on frws is to do as the text > does) > > Cdlt, ~nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
