On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Brion Vibber <br...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > On 1/20/09 1:40 PM, Platonides wrote: >> They could benefit from drafts, but in that case better to do it on the >> browser itself. IMHO we still need some kind of saving into firefox >> storage, for cases like a read-only db. Instead of 'You can't save, the >> site is read-only'->'Save-draft'->'No, you can't, the db is read-only', >> 'You can't save, the site is read-only'->'Save-draft'->'The site is >> read-only, the draft has been saved into your browser'. > > Client-side storage would be fantastic (and avoid unnecessary server > round-trips). We discussed this in original planning but didn't get > round to implementing it yet.
Surely plenty of people want to work on drafts from home at work? Of course, we shouldn't be editing Wikipedia at work, should we? ;-) -- Andrew Garrett _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
