On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Niklas
Laxström<niklas.laxst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When using CDB, the cache is constant. You can't do incremental
> updates.
You can, you just have to write an entirely new database every time.
This will already have to be done every time the messages change.
Changes to {{SITENAME}} should be much rarer, so it shouldn't be a big
burden.
> And what if WMF uses *single* cache for all projects?
If the cache is only for default messages (is it?), then of course it
doesn't help here. We could still use memcached.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Platonides<platoni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How is it going to improve the current message files?
Because it would be able to read only the messages it needed and not
have to execute megabytes of useless PHP code on every request, I
assume.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
