Tim Starling wrote: > Dmitriy Sintsov wrote: > >> Hi! >> Is there any progress on this? Or, that's closed topic and such built-in >> language won't be implemented? >> By the way, the lots of MediaWiki installations use TeX, so OCaml is >> already available as the language for extensions. Imagine #ocaml parser >> function or an ocaml tag. It's not the most lightweight choise, though. >> Also, Bryan Tong Minh had a great idea - choosing between an external >> (compiled) version of Lua (or another scripting language) and >> "fallback" to slow built-in interpreter, when the first choice is >> unavailable. Perhaps a limited subset of Lua. >> > > That thread was just talk, I don't think anyone was interested enough > to actually do anything. Nobody made any promises. > > -- Tim Starling > I did do some experimentation in making JavaScript embeddable. Hit a small snag that I needed help with, but Lua's dev hasn't seamed to have responded to my query.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name] -- ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name] _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
