> This morning I bumped the revision number to 2.0[0]. Some > people on IRC didn't like this, so I reverted it and I'm bringing > it here. I don't think anyone really wants to keep doing 1.x > releases (people seriously get confused that 1.10 comes after > 1.6).
Hi Chad, thanks for that initiative. I agree our current system is confusing, although I think criticism would have been better placed 2.5 years ago, when we released 1.10 ;) > - Drop the 1 from 1.17.x and make the releases start counting > from 17.x, 18.x, etc. Would work, although its confusing to change existing releases. And it isn't practical in case we want a new major realease someday (Phase IV anyone? ;)) > - Bump 1.x to 2.0 and move forward from there. Should be done for the next major release (if we ever have one of those) > - Drop numbers entirely, and pick silly names Doesn't make releases less confusing. I agree that our current schema sucks, but at least until we have some kind of major release that would justify moving to 2.0, I don't see a good alternative. Regards, CoE
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
