2010/7/21 Aryeh Gregor <simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Platonides <platoni...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It's not the same. You can have different standards. I see revisions >> that are "apparently good", but marking as ok is "This revision is >> right" in my book, which in many cases would need actually testing it, >> checking spec, and so that I (lazily) don't do. So it keeps as new >> instead of as "lightly reviewed". > > Is it useful to know that something is lightly reviewed? > I would say so, yes. The more people 'lightly review' something, the less likely it is to have obvious-ish flaws. However, most of the time the name of the person that reviewed it is the most significant piece of information, assuming you know the reviewers well.
Roan Kattouw (Catrope) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
