On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Platonides <platoni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Bryan Tong Minh wrote:
>>> Also, on places where no memcached or equivalent is available (i.e.
>>> CACHE_NONE), this will not work.
>>
>> Then you could be using the objectcache table in the database.
>>
>>
>
> No, that's CACHE_DB. CACHE_NONE really means what it
> says.
>
I could force the usage of the objectcache table even for CACHE_NONE
by creating my own cache object with wfGetCache( CACHE_DB ); Are there
any objections for (ab)using the objectcache table for this purpose?


Bryan

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to