On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Platonides <platoni...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Bryan Tong Minh wrote: >>> Also, on places where no memcached or equivalent is available (i.e. >>> CACHE_NONE), this will not work. >> >> Then you could be using the objectcache table in the database. >> >> > > No, that's CACHE_DB. CACHE_NONE really means what it > says. > I could force the usage of the objectcache table even for CACHE_NONE by creating my own cache object with wfGetCache( CACHE_DB ); Are there any objections for (ab)using the objectcache table for this purpose?
Bryan _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
