On 10/12/10 10:29 PM, Ryan Lane wrote:
>> The only response I've gotten so far is "merge into core", which is an
>> interesting response, but does not resolve the issue at hand, which is,
>> until we do so (assuming we do at some point after 1.17), what should
>> this extension be named?
>>
>> I'm not defending the current name any more than stating it's my
>> preference. I'm not only open to naming it something else, but I'm
>> asking for input on what to name it.
>>
>> Some people are being somewhat combatant or getting tangential in their
>> responses - fine, basically what I expect form this list - but I'm still
>> very interested in responses to do with my original question, "should we
>> rename it, and if so, what should we name it?".
>>
> Please, please, don't rename it again. Every time the name changes
> things break. They break for us, they break for third parties using
> SVN, and it breaks our ability to easily support the extensions when
> people ask for help.
>
> Leave the name alone, and merge it into core as soon as possible.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Ryan Lane
>
+1... sounds very reasonable to me.
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to