On 2010-10-13, Trevor Parscal wrote: > Thank you, everyone, for responding so far (not trying to stop you > here). Here's where it seems we're at. > > 1. Having an extension called "Vector" is neither descriptive or > clear, and it is anticipated to cause confusion. > 2. System administrators are not enjoying things being switched > around on them, and would prefer the name either not change or for > the extension to be merged into core. > 3. 3 out of 5 code reviewers are voting that it should be merged into > core (Brion and Tim have not weighed in yet).
I did not realise decisions were now being voted on by code reviewers, this is very concerning. > My original hesitation to merge Vector (not to be lumped together with > WikiEditor) into core was always that we were going to be extremely lean > on CodeReview prior to 1.17 due to Tim Starling's limited availability > right now. Since then we've added Roan, Chad, and me, and even brought > Brion back for a bit part time to help out, thus increasing our capacity > beyond what was originally expected. I think under these new > circumstances, if we have Roan and Chad willing to help me integrate it > into core and sign off on it, it will likely be of very little > additional effort for our release manager (Tim Starling) to sign off as > well, thus alleviating my apprehension about merging it prior to 1.17. Since it has been deployed to the Wikimedia cluster, has it not already had more than sufficient review that we would be comfortable including it in a release? > So, unless there's any objection, I will go ahead and merge the Vector > extension into core as part of the Vector skin immediately, rather than > waiting until after 1.17. That would be great. Robert _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
