> As to Toolserver, this environment and its functionality is deeply flawed. > As the tools are open source, there is no reason why relevant tools cannot > be brought into GIT and upgraded to a level where they are of production > quality. Either GIT is able to cope or its distributed character adds no > real value. > > The notion that it has to be MediaWiki core and or its extensions first is > absurd when you consider that it is what we use to run one of the biggest > websites of the world. We rely on the continued support for our production > process. The daily process provided by LocalisationUpdate is such a > production process. When the continuity of production processes is not a > prime priority, something is fundamentally wrong.
You are misunderstanding. The thread isn't about toolserver, so you are muddying up a perfectly valid thread with something totally non-related. Yes, toolserver has a problem, and it should be addressed. It isn't a problem with the MediaWiki developer community though, it's a problem with the toolserver community, and they need to fix it. But again, let's focus on one issue at a time. - Ryan Lane _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
