2012/1/3 Erik Moeller <e...@wikimedia.org>:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Strainu <strain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I wouldn't be so fast in leaving only the sitename as sender name - a
>> mail from "Wikipedia" would raise my (manual) spam alarms, just like
>> emails from the "Federal Bureau of Investigations" or from "[X] Bank".
>
> Facebook's email messages come from "Facebook".
> Twitter's email messages come from "Twitter".
> Google Plus email messages come from "Google+".

Flickr's email messages come from "Flickr mail"
Linkedin's email messages come from different senders - by far the
best solution.
(Installed) Wordpress' emails come from different senders
AOL's (does anyone remember them?) emails come from different senders.

> OpenTable email messages come from "OpenTable".
> Netflix email messages come from "Netflix".
> Kickstarter email messages come from "Kickstarter".
> Quora email messages come from "Quora".

I'll have to take your word on that, I don't use those services. :)

>
> Not every wheel needs to be reinvented. :)
>

If you're not sure it's round, you're better off building it again or
it may crash you car.

The point is there really isn't a rule on this matter, it is just a
question of preference or marketing.

Strainu

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to