Well I don't have any experience in RDFa, but looking at the proposal, it seems like something we should do.
*-- * *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015 Major in Computer Science www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Daniel Friesen <dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com>wrote: > On Wed, 08 May 2013 03:52:07 -0700, Daniel Friesen < > dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com> wrote: > > I was going through our code contemplating dropping XHTML 1.1 support and >> ran into the RDFa support stuff and realized how out of date and limited it >> is. >> >> I've put together an RFC for replacing our code that appears to be based >> on the RDFa 1.0 from 2008 with RDFa 1.1 and expanding support for RDFa. >> >> https://www.mediawiki.org/**wiki/Requests_for_comment/** >> Update_our_code_to_use_RDFa_1.**1_instead_of_RDFa_1.0<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Update_our_code_to_use_RDFa_1.1_instead_of_RDFa_1.0> >> > > Is no-one at all interested in RDFa? > > No opposition. No enthusiasm. No... "Just go ahead and do it"? > > > -- > ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://danielfriesen.name/] > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l> > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
