On 9 May 2013 18:29, Daniel Friesen <dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 08 May 2013 03:52:07 -0700, Daniel Friesen < > dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com> wrote: > > I was going through our code contemplating dropping XHTML 1.1 support and >> ran into the RDFa support stuff and realized how out of date and limited it >> is. >> >> I've put together an RFC for replacing our code that appears to be based >> on the RDFa 1.0 from 2008 with RDFa 1.1 and expanding support for RDFa. >> >> https://www.mediawiki.org/**wiki/Requests_for_comment/** >> Update_our_code_to_use_RDFa_1.**1_instead_of_RDFa_1.0<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Update_our_code_to_use_RDFa_1.1_instead_of_RDFa_1.0> >> > > Is no-one at all interested in RDFa? > > No opposition. No enthusiasm. No... "Just go ahead and do it"? I'm in favour. :-) Seems a sensible change all round, and there don't appear to be reasons against. J. -- James D. Forrester Product Manager, VisualEditor Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. jforres...@wikimedia.org | @jdforrester _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
