On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Subramanya Sastry <ssas...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > On 07/23/2013 05:28 PM, John Vandenberg wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Subramanya Sastry >> <ssas...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi John and Risker, >>> >>> First off, I do want to once again clarify that my intention in the >>> previous >>> post was not to claim that VE/Parsoid is perfect. It was more that we've >>> fixed sufficient bugs at this point that the most significant "bugs" >>> (bugs, >>> not missing features) that need fixing (and are being fixed) are those >>> that >>> have to do with usability tweaks. >> >> How do you know that? Have you performed automated tests on all >> Wikipedia content? Or are you waiting for users to find these bugs? > > > http://parsoid.wmflabs.org:8001/stats > > This is the url for our round trip testing on 160K pages (20K each from 8 > wikipedias).
Fantastic! How frequently are those tests re-run? Could you add a last-run-date on that page? Was a regression testsuite built using the issues encountered during the last parser rewrite? -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
