On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:46 PM, rupert THURNER <rupert.thur...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Am 15.09.2013 17:13 schrieb "Merlijn van Deen" <valhall...@arctus.nl>: > ... > > As you may be aware, the git-review based developer experience on Windows > > is less than perfect - especially compared to the old TortoiseSVN based > > workflow. > > Merlijn, as i m not contributing code here but am very interested in > suitable git workflows, i am a little shy to ask, but what is the main > disadvantage compared to contributors on linux, and whats the main > disadvantage compared to subversion? > I believe it's not subversion itself as much as the user-interface of TortoiseSVN, which lots of people have found easy to use and powerful. git-review kind of forces you to use the command-line interface to git, which also tends to be slightly more complicated on Windows than on Linux because you're kind of smashing together a Unix-like environment and a Windows-like environment. (ick!) I'm used to git on Linux and OS X, but I'm still a bit frustrated when I end up having to do some git work on Windows. GitHub has a nice GUI app for Windows which should make it fairly easy to send a pull request (which we then bridge straight into gerrit), or folks may more easily use a different git front-end UI they prefer, if they don't have to poke git-review directly. Alternatively, we could try to get git-review type support into some of those GUI tools... -- brion _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
