On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Antoine Musso <hashar+...@free.fr> wrote:
> == git submodule == > > + command already available > + already used by Wikimedia to handle extensions dependencies in the > wmf branches > + let us review the code > + ability to patch third parties > - require to fully clone each repositories > Couldn't you do a shallow clone, if the disk space or bandwidth is a concern? > - version tracked by git sha1 in .gitmodules instead of a version number > > > == composer == > > + generates autoloader entries > + has a post install system which could be used to inject settings in > LocalSettings.php > This could well be a minus if it winds up being done poorly. + could be used to handle extensions dependencies > - depends on upstream to incorporate our patches > Well, we could fork if necessary. Although that's seldom fun. > - needs to install composer > This is one of my pet peeves. It's one thing to have to install dependencies to run MediaWiki, but having to install various dependencies just to *install* it? Ugh! Composer is a first step. Then there's the proposals floating around to make various nodejs services be required (which themselves tend to be a pain because they seem to require dozens of npm packages), which leads to proposals that MediaWiki require puppet/docker/something like that just to be installed because of the overly complex interdependencies. I have nothing against puppet/docker/etc in general, but it seems like overkill for running a simple MediaWiki installation off of a single host. - might not be used as-is on Wikimedia cluster > -- Brad Jorsch (Anomie) Software Engineer Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l