Yes, yes, a thousand times yes. We're tracking all sorts of nontechnical stuff in Phab too these days, there is no reason at all we should close out legit technical issues with site JS, CSS, Gadgets, templates, etc without actually doing something to help.
-- brion On Jul 15, 2015 11:28 PM, "Amir E. Aharoni" <amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote: > Hi, > > In the past it happened to me a few times that I opened bugs about > something wrong that happened on a Wikimedia site, and it was closed as > invalid because the issue was not in MediaWiki code, but in a local gadget, > style or template on that project. > > The bugs were actually fixed, but I'd like to question the "invalid" > closure. > > They were real bugs in real products. The fact that the software is not in > Gerrit doesn't mean that they don't affect the product de facto. Just for > the sake of example, if a bug in a local Gadget affects the Flow extension, > for example, I find it perfectly valid to add tag the Flow tag to it. Core > and extension developers should be curious about how what they developed > behaves in the wild. > > I do wonder what other tags are there to add to such a bug? I'm going to > open one now. > > (P.S. Yes, this raises an issue of whether non-Wikimedia sites should > count. I say - yes, and it shouldn't be limited unless it gets seriously > out of hand. But a URL with reproduction instructions must always be > provided.) > > -- > Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי > http://aharoni.wordpress.com > “We're living in pieces, > I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
