Le 23/08/2015 01:09, Brian Wolff a écrit : > On 8/22/15, Tyler Romeo <tylerro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Brian Wolff <bawo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> For example, MediaWiki is intentionally GPLv2, not GPLv3. >> >> >> MediaWiki is not intentionally GPLv2. It merely is v2 now and the community >> cannot come to a consensus on whether to change it, thus it remains in its >> current stagnant state. > > I would consider that intentional. The status quo is intentionally > staying as it is, because there isn't agreement to change it. (I'll be > honest though, I don't really remember what the result was last time > the whole GPL version thing was discussed) > > Unintentional I would define as - everyone thinks its a good idea to > switch, but nobody could be bothered to update the wiki page.
To be fair, the license is GPLv2 or later. I am myself opposed to switch to GPLv3. Given the amount of code I own in MediaWiki core, I think I am in a position to veto such a switch. But I am not a lawyer. -- Antoine "hashar" Musso _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
