Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since we currently can't check in the changes the situation for
> every Wine developer will be exactly the same, with the exception
> that developers now can check in the changes to the appropriate
> workgroup if he is prepared to accept the privacy violation.
You can't commit directly to the main tree, but you can perfectly have
your own local tree today without the whole world knowing about
it. And maintaining a local tree is precisely something that is
somewhat painful with CVS and that bitkeeper is supposed to be good
at.
> > Or maybe simply you don't want to
> > have your email address stored publicly on bitkeeper servers.
>
> Well, we already have that problem with the wine-cvs list.
You are not forced to reveal your email address. If anybody doesn't
want his email in the log, all he has to do is ask me not to put it
in.
> Yes, as I said I don't like it very much either, but you
> can't both have the cake and eat it can you?
Of course; I'm not complaining, the BitKeeper guys are free to pick
whatever license they like. But as long as they stick to their current
license, I'm going to stick to CVS.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
