Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's no sense in aiming for ultraclean rpath solutions... as I
> understand, neither rpath, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, nor ld.so.conf modifications
> will be required in Wine 1.0 anyway, because by then we should have
> Alexandre's perfect DLL separation with import system that makes ELF
> dependencies a thing of the past.
Not entirely; we won't have the problem with dlls, but we'll still
need a way to locate libwine.so and libwine_unicode.so.
> And I'd definitely *not* go for the editing-the-ld.so.conf solution.
> Conflicts with gnumeric's libole2.so have already been reported to the
> Debian bug tracker in the past...
Agreed; today the best approach IMO is to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH in a
wrapper script like winelauncher. But of course this only works if we
never set rpath.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
