On 9 Nov 2000, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There's no sense in aiming for ultraclean rpath solutions... as I
> > understand, neither rpath, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, nor ld.so.conf modifications
> > will be required in Wine 1.0 anyway, because by then we should have
> > Alexandre's perfect DLL separation with import system that makes ELF
> > dependencies a thing of the past.
>
> Not entirely; we won't have the problem with dlls, but we'll still
> need a way to locate libwine.so and libwine_unicode.so.
Not those either. Those are probably not going to be in /usr/lib/wine, but
in /usr/lib, an area that certainly wouldn't require some rpath solution
in any case. (And a name like "libwine" isn't likely to conflict with
other stuff in there...) That's how it's done today, too.
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is something that should be used for relocated
installations, not standard installations, in my opinion...
