On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:56:52AM -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > At 10:20 AM 2/13/2002, Dan Kegel wrote: > > >> No; the LGPL would provide a way for the vendors to sabotage > >> one another -- and, most likely, ALL fail as businesses. > > > >Sabotage? Brett, you might be getting a bit carried away here. > > No, I'm not. Richard Stallman himself has stated that the purpose > of the GPL's "poison pill" is to turn developers against their > colleagues and the organizations for which they work. His writings > even urge programmers to put GPLed code into the work they do for > their employers for the express purpose of forcing them to give > away the code!
You keep on making unsubstantiated claims like this. Post some *exact* references (not quotes) to papers or transcriptions which support each of your points or I do not see how anyone on this list can continue to take you seriously. Plato (Do not CC me, please. I am on the list)
